Lista de causas de mortes evitáveis por intervenções do Sistema Único de Saúde do Brasil
AUTOR(ES): Malta, Deborah Carvalho; Morais Neto, Otaliba Libânio de; Duarte, Elisabeth Carmen; Almeida, Márcia Furquim de; Moura, Lenildo de; Dias, Maria Angélica de Salles; Ferraz, Walter; Souza, Maria de Fatima Marinho de.
ANO: 2007
RESUMO: As causas de mortes evitáveis ou reduzíveis são definidas como aquelas preveníveis, total ou parcialmente, por ações efetivas dos serviços de saúde que estejam acessíveis em um determinado local e época. Essas causas devem ser revisadas à luz da evolução do conhecimento e tecnologia para prática da atenção à saúde. Portanto, este estudo está fundamentado em uma revisão da literatura referente à base conceitual e empírica das listas de causas de morte evitáveis, publicadas entre 1975 e 2004, e nas reflexões de um grupo de trabalho organizado pelo Ministério da Saúde do Brasil. O artigo propõe duas listas brasileiras desses eventos - para menores de cinco anos; e para pessoas com cinco ou mais anos de idade -, tendo por referência a tecnologia disponível no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS). Embora esse debate se encontre em estágio inicial, seu aprofundamento parece promissor para o desenvolvimento metodológico do monitoramento e avaliação de desempenho da atenção à saúde no Brasil.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: MALTA, Deborah Carvalho et al. Lista de causas de mortes evitáveis por intervenções do Sistema Único de Saúde do Brasil. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde [online]. 2007, vol.16, n.4 [citado 2016-11-04], pp.233-244. Disponível em:
Is Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) a valid indicator for health systems evaluation?
AUTOR(ES): Romero, M., Vivas-Consuelo, D., & Alvis-Guzman, N.
ANO: 2013
RESUMO: The purpose of this review is to do a discussion about the use of the HRQoL as a health measure of the populations that enable to analyze its potential use as a measure of development and efficiency of health systems. The principal use of the HRQoL is in health technologies economics evaluation; however this measure can be use in public health when need to know the health state of population. The WHO recognizes its potential use but its necessary to do a discussion about your difficulties for its application and restrictions for its use as a performance indicator for the health systems. The review show the different aspects about the use of HRQoL how a measure of efficiency ot the health system, each aspect identified in the literature is analyzed and discussed, developing the pros and cons of their possible use, especially when it comes as a cardinal measure. The analysis allows recognize that measuring HRQoL in countries could serve as a useful indicator, especially when it seeks to measure the level of health and disease, as do most of the indicators of current use. However, the methodological constraints that do not allow comparability between countries especially when you have large socioeconomic differences have yet to be resolved to allow comparison between different regions.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: Romero, M., Vivas-Consuelo, D., & Alvis-Guzman, N. (2013). Is Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) a valid indicator for health systems evaluation? SpringerPlus, 2(1), 664. http://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-664
Institutional and Economic Determinants of Public Health System Performance
AUTOR(ES): Mays, Glen; McHugh, Megan; Shim, Kyumin; Perry, Natalie; Lenaway, Dennis; Halverson, Paul; Moonesinghe, Ramal.
ANO: 2006
RESUMO: OBJECTIVES: Although a growing body of evidence demonstrates that availability and quality of essential public health services vary widely across communities, relatively little is known about the factors that give rise to these variations. We examined the association of institutional, financial, and community characteristics of local public health delivery systems and the performance of essential services. METHODS: Performance measures were collected from local public health systems in 7 states and combined with secondary data sources. Multivariate, linear, and nonlinear regression models were used to estimate associations between system characteristics and the performance of essential services. RESULTS: Performance varied significantly with the size, financial resources, and organizational structure of local public health systems, with some public health services appearing more sensitive to these characteristics than others. Staffing levels and community characteristics also appeared to be related to the performance of selected services. CONCLUSIONS: Reconfiguring the organization and financing of public health systems in some communities-such as through consolidation and enhanced intergovernmental coordination-may hold promise for improving the performance of essential services.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: MAYS et al. Institutional and Economic Determinants of Public Health System Performance. American Journal of Public Health. 2006;96(3):523-531. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.064253.
Inequities in healthcare utilization: results of the Brazilian National Health Survey, 2013
AUTOR(ES): Boccolini, Cristiano Siqueira; Borges, Paulo Roberto.
ANO: 2016
RESUMO: Background: The Brazilian Unified Health System is a public healthcare system that has universal and equitable access among its main principles, but the continental size of the country and the complexity of the public health system complicate the task of providing equal access to all. We aim to investigate the factors associated with inequities in healthcare utilization in Brazil. Methods: We employed data from a nationally representative cross-sectional study (2013 National Health Survey; n = 60,202). The outcome was underutilization of healthcare by adults, defined as lack of utilization of one or more of these services: physician or dentist consultation, and blood glucose or blood pressure screening. A logistic regression model, considering the complex sample, was employed (alpha = 5 %). Results: 0.7 % of the sample never visited a physician, 3.3 % never visited a dentist, 3 % never underwent blood pressure screening, 11.5 % never underwent blood glucose screening, and 15 % never utilized at least one of these services. Multivariate models showed a higher likelihood of underutilization of healthcare among individuals of the lowest social class "E" (AOR = 6.31, 95 % CI = 3.76-10.61), younger adults (Adjusted Odds Ratio, or AOR = 4.40, 95 % CI = 3.78-5.12), those with no formal education or incomplete primary education (AOR = 2.93, 95 % CI = 2.30-3.74), males (AOR = 2.16, 95 % CI = 1.99-2.35), and those without private health insurance (AOR = 2.11, 95 % CI = 1.83-2.44). Individuals self-classified as "white" were less likely to report underutilization (AOR = 0.82, 95 % CI = 0.75-0.90). Conclusions: Despite recent expansion of primary healthcare and oral health programs in Brazil, we observed gaps in healthcare utilization among the most vulnerable segments of the population.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: Boccolini and de Souza Junior The official journal of the International Society for Equity in Health (2016) 15:150. DOI 10.1186/s12939-016-0444-3.
Inequalities in health: de?nitions, concepts, and theories
AUTOR(ES): Arcaya, Mariana C., Alyssa L. Arcaya, and S. V. Subramanian.
ANO: 2015
RESUMO: Individuals from different backgrounds, social groups, and countries enjoy different levels of health. This article defines and distinguishes between unavoidable health inequalities and unjust and preventable health inequities. We describe the dimensions along which health inequalities are commonly examined, including across the global population, between countries or states, and within geographies, by socially relevant groupings such as race/ethnicity, gender, education, caste, income, occupation, and more. Different theories attempt to explain group-level differences in health, including psychosocial, material deprivation, health behavior, environmental, and selection explanations. Concepts of relative versus absolute; doseresponse versus threshold; composition versus context; place versus space; the life course perspective on health; causal pathways to health; conditional health effects; and group-level versus individual differences are vital in understanding health inequalities. We close by reflecting on what conditions make health inequalities unjust, and to consider the merits of policies that prioritize the elimination of health disparities versus those that focus on raising the overall standard of health in a population.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: Arcaya, M. C., Arcaya, A. L., & Subramanian, S. V. (2015). Inequalities in health: definitions, concepts, and theories. Global Health Action, 8, 10.3402/gha.v8.27106. http://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v8.27106
Inequalities in health in Scotland: what are they and what can we do about them?
AUTOR(ES): Macintyre, Sally.
ANO: 2007
RESUMO: This paper is based on a briefing paper commissioned by the Health Improvement Directorate of the Scottish Government for the Ministerial Task Force on Health Inequalities.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: Macintyre, S. Occasional paper number 17: inequalities in health in Scotland: what are they and what can we do about them?. MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow (2007).
Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries
AUTOR(ES): Van Doorslaer, E., Masseria, C., Koolman, X., & for the OECD Health Equity Research Group.
ANO: 2006
RESUMO: Background: Most of the member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) aim to ensure equitable access to health care. This is often interpreted as requiring that care be available on the basis of need and not willingness or ability to pay. We sought to examine equity in physician utilization in 21 OECD countries for the year 2000. Methods: Using data from national surveys or from the European Community Household Panel, we extracted the number of visits to a general practitioner or medical specialist over the previous 12 months. Visits were standardized for need differences using age, sex and reported health levels as proxies. We measured inequity in doctor utilization by income using concentration indices of the need-standardized use. Results: We found inequity in physician utilization favouring patients who are better off in about half of the OECD countries studied. The degree of pro-rich inequity in doctor use is highest in the United States and Mexico, followed by Finland, Portugal and Sweden. In most countries, we found no evidence of inequity in the distribution of general practitioner visits across income groups, and where it does occur, it often indicates a pro-poor distribution. However, in all countries for which data are available, after controlling for need differences, people with higher incomes are significantly more likely to see a specialist than people with lower incomes and, in most countries, also more frequently. Pro-rich inequity is especially large in Portugal, Finland and Ireland. Interpretation: Although in most OECD countries general practitioner care is distributed fairly equally and is often even pro-poor, the very pro-rich distribution of specialist care tends to make total doctor utilization somewhat pro-rich. This phenomenon appears to be universal, but it is reinforced when private insurance or private care options are offered.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: Van Doorslaer, Eddy et al. "Inequalities in Access to Medical Care by Income in Developed Countries." CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal, 174.2 (2006): 177-183.
Indicadores de desempenho no Sistema Único de Saúde: uma avaliação dos avanços e lacunas
AUTOR(ES): Albuquerque, Ceres; Martins, Mônica.
ANO: 2017
RESUMO: A Matriz de Indicadores desenvolvida pelo Projeto de Avaliação de Desempenho de Sistemas de Saúde tornou-se marco de referência no País. A partir da implantação do Pacto pela Saúde no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) e seus sucedâneos, sistematizam-se os indicadores empregados para avaliação e acompanhamento do desempenho do SUS, no período de 2007 a 2015, que são classificados segundo o quadro teórico-conceitual do projeto. Verifica-se a existência ou não de indicadores para as diversas dimensões e sua relevância para a avaliação do desempenho do SUS.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: Albuquerque, Ceres; Martins, Mônica. Indicadores de desempenho no Sistema Único de Saúde: uma avaliação dos avanços e lacunas. Saúde Debate. Rio de Janeiro, v.41, n. especial, p.118-137, mar 2017.
Improved Health System performance throught better care coordination
AUTOR(ES): Hofmarcher, M.M; Oxley, H.; Rusticelli, E.
ANO: 2007
RESUMO: This report attempts to assess whether -- and to what degree ñ better care coordination can improve health system performance in terms of quality and cost-efficiency. Coordination of care refers to policies that help create patient-centred care that is more coherent both within and across care settings and over time. Broadly speaking, it means making health-care systems more attentive to the needs of individual patients and ensuring they get the appropriate care for acute episodes as well as care aimed at stabilising their health over long periods in less costly environments. These issues are of particular interest to patients with chronic conditions and the elderly who may find it difficult to "navigate" fragmented health-care systems that are often found in OECD countries.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: Hofmarcher, M.M., H. Oxley, and E. Rusticelli. 2007. Improved Health System Performance through Better Care Coordination. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 30, December 2007.
Impact of primary health care on mortality from heart and cerebrovascular diseases in Brazil: a nationwide analysis of longitudinal data
AUTOR(ES): Rasella Davide, Harhay Michael O, Pamponet Marina L, Aquino Rosana, Barreto Mauricio L
ANO: 2014
RESUMO: Objectives: To evaluate the impact of Brazil's recently implemented Family Health Program (FHP), the largest primary health care programme in the world, on heart and cerebrovascular disease mortality across Brazil from 2000 to 2009. Design: Ecological longitudinal design, evaluating the impact of FHP using negative binomial regression models for panel data with fixed effects specifications. Setting: Nationwide analysis of data from Brazilian municipalities covering the period from 2000 to 2009. Data sources: 1622 Brazilian municipalities with vital statistics of adequate quality. Main outcome measures: The annual FHP coverage and the average FHP coverage in previous years were used as main independent variables and classified as none (0%), incipient (<30%), intermediate (30-69%), or consolidated (?70%). Age standardised mortality rates from causes in the group of cerebrovascular (ICD-10 codes I60-69), ischaemic (ICD-10 I20-25), and other forms of heart diseases (ICD-10 I30-52), which were included in the national list of ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, were calculated for each municipality for each year. They accounted for 40% of all deaths from these groups during the study period. Results: FHP coverage was negatively associated with mortality rates from cerebrovascular and heart diseases (ambulatory care-sensitive conditions) in both unadjusted and adjusted models for demographic, social, and economic confounders. The FHP had no effect on the mortality rate for accidents, used as a control. The rate ratio for the effect of consolidated annual FHP coverage on cerebrovascular disease mortality and on heart disease mortality was 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.79 to 0.86) and 0.79 (0.75 to 0.80) respectively, reaching the value of 0.69 (0.66 to 0.73) and 0.64 (0.59 to 0.68) when the coverage was consolidated during all the previous eight years. Moreover, FHP coverage increased the number of health education activities, domiciliary visits, and medical consultations and reduced hospitalisation rates for cerebrovascular and heart disease. Several complementary analyses showed quantitatively similar results. Conclusions: Comprehensive and community based primary health care programmes, such as the FHP in Brazil, acting through cardiovascular disease prevention, care, and follow-up can contribute to decreased cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality in a developing country such as Brazil.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: Rasella Davide, Harhay Michael O, Pamponet Marina L, Aquino Rosana, Barreto Mauricio L. Impact of primary health care on mortality from heart and cerebrovascular diseases in Brazil: a nationwide analysis of longitudinal data BMJ 2014; 349 :g4014.
How close have universal health systems come to achieving equity in use of curative services? A systematic review.
AUTOR(ES): Hanratty,B.; Zhang,T.; Whitehead,M.
ANO: 2007
RESUMO: Most governments in established market economies have developed universal systems of health care, but these are being increasingly threatened by widespread health sector reforms. Hence, it is more important than ever to monitor the effects of policy changes on the ability of universal systems to achieve their equity goals. This article provides evidence for such monitoring. The authors present the results of a systematic review of equity in use of curative health services in universal systems, together with a critical appraisal of the essential components of studies to address this question. Of the 79 studies identified that addressed the review question, only 26 met the inclusion criteria and adjusted for differential health need across socioeconomic groups. The authors found a pro-rich bias in use of specialist hospital services and a reasonably equitable access to primary health care by different socioeconomic groups. There was a wide inter-study variation in the difference in utilization rates between people of high and low socioeconomic groups. Improvements are needed in the way that equity in universal systems is monitored, with particular attention to how "need" is defined and to the impact on patients of indirect costs.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: Hanratty, Barbara; Zhang, Tuohong; Whitehead, Margaret. How Close Have Universal Health Systems Come to Achieving Equity in Use of Curative Services? A Systematic Review. International Journal of Health Services, 2007. Vol 37, Issue 1, pp. 89-109.
Health, United States, 2007: With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans
AUTOR(ES): National Center for Health Statistics (US)
ANO: 2007
RESUMO: Health, United States, 2007 is the 31st report on the health status of the Nation and is submitted by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services to the President and the Congress of the United States in compliance with Section 308 of the Public Health Service Act. This report was compiled by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics served in a review capacity. The Health, United States series presents national trends in health statistics. Each report includes an executive summary, highlights, a chartbook, trend tables, extensive appendixes, and an index.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: National Center for Health Statistics (US) . Health, United States, 2007: With Chartbook on Trends in the Health of Americans. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics (US); 2007 Nov. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK21014/
Health Systems Institucional Characteristcs: a survey of 29 OECD countries
AUTOR(ES): Paris, Valerie; Devaux, Marion; Wei, Lihan.
ANO: 2010
RESUMO: In 2008, the OECD launched a survey to collect information on the health systems characteristics of member countries. This paper presents the informaton provided by 29 of these countries in 2009. It describes country-specific arrangements to organise the population coverage against health risks and the financing of health spending. It depicts the organisation of health care delivery, focusing on the public/private mix of health care provision, provider payment schemes, user choice and competition among providers, as well as the regulation of heallth care suppply and prices. Finally, this document provides information on governnance and resource allocation in health systems (decentralisation in decisionmaking, nature of budget constraints and priority setting).
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: PARIS et al."Health Systems Institutional Characteristics: A Survey of 29 OECD Countries", OECD Health Working Papers, No. 50, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2010. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kmfxfq9qbnr-en
Health System snapshots: perspectives from six countries
AUTOR(ES): Vários autores
ANO: 2008
RESUMO: In this issue of Eurohealth we include snapshots on six countries. Originally commissioned and funded by the New York based Commonwealth Fund, and prepared in a common format, they provide an opportunity to reflect on approaches to efficiency and quality improvement.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: Health System Snapshots: Perspectives from six countries. Eurohealth, Volume 14, Number 1, 2008.
Health System Assessment Approach: A How-To Manual Version 3.0
AUTOR(ES): HSA
ANO: 2016
RESUMO: USAID's Office of Health Systems and the Health Finance and Governance Project (HFG), in collaboration with WHO, have undertaken the revision of the Health Systems Assessment Approach (HSAA). This collaborative effort has included technical leadership from USAID's central health systems projects, including Applying Science to Strengthen and Improve Systems (ASSIST), Systems for Improved Access to Pharmaceuticals and Services (SIAPS), Promoting the Quality of Medicines (PQM), Human Resources for Health 2030 (HRH 2030), and MEASURE Evaluation. Our update of the manual focused on three broad tasks: 1) Technical updates from subject experts from the above listed projects and WHO; 2) Assessing the health system's ability to effectively undertake core functions to achieve universal health coverage; 3) and Adding more 'systems thinking' guidance and techniques.
FONTE:
REFERENCIA: HSA. The Health System Assessment Approach: A How-To Manual. Version 3.0, 2016. www.healthsystemassessment.org